How to Reduce Gun Violence in the United States
Browse articles:
Auto Beauty Business Culture Dieting DIY Events Fashion Finance Food Freelancing Gardening Health Hobbies Home Internet Jobs Law Local Media Men's Health Mobile Nutrition Parenting Pets Pregnancy Products Psychology Real Estate Relationships Science Seniors Sports Technology Travel Wellness Women's Health
Browse companies:
Automotive Crafts & Gifts Department Stores Electronics Fashion Food & Drink Health & Beauty Home & Garden Online Services Sports & Outdoors Subscription Boxes Toys, Kids & Baby Travel & Events

How to Reduce Gun Violence in the United States

Comparing United States Gun Violence with other nations

In the year 2000, gun violence was the cause of 8,493 United States citizens killed in a population of over 270 million. Comparing United States with Great Britain, Great Britain had fifty two instances of firearms resulting in death that has a populace of 59.5 million in 1997. Australia has 65 firearms resulting in death with a populace of 19 million in 1999. Japan had 22 deaths connected to guns with a populace of 126 million. It is obvious that gun violence in the United States is far greater than the rest of the nations that were previously cited.

The Brady Bill

To control gun violence, gun supporters believe there is a problem with gun violence in the United States of America. Compared with other nations with stronger gun management actions in Australia, Great Britain and Japan. These Nations have less death due to firearms than the United States. In 1994, The Brady Bill was implemented due to the fact that White House press secretary James Brady was seriously wounded in an attempt to assassinate the United States President, Ronald Reagan in 1981 by John Hinckley Jr. The Brady Bill instituted methods to prevent gun violence with a background check and waiting period before a gun can be obtained. To further prevent gun violence the United States of America should look at other nation laws and procedures to prevent further tragedy.

Is the Brady Bill a Solution to Gun Violence?

The use of a Gun During a Robbery between 1994 to 1998 fell by 33.7% from 257,483 to 170,611 since the Brady Bill took place. This also reduced the homicide rate by 29% in 1994. Despite these reductions, the fact is that thirty two states were bound to this law while 18 states were not. The NRA states that the 18 states that didn’t have the Brady Bill had a 16.4 decrease while the 32 states had only a 9% decrease.

Alternative Solution

An alternative to the Brady Bill was the gun buyback programs that were first implemented by Australia and Great Britain. President Bill Clinton in 1999 planned a $15 million agenda to reduce the number of guns that were in and around housing projects. 50.00 were given to each person that turned their gun into their local police station. Between 1999-2000 20,000 guns were turned in. But Bill Clinton’s program was terminated by George W. Bush in 2001.


All though the Brady Bill was effect, I think that the gun buyback program was more successful. What is your opinion with this. My opinion is gun is used to protect but they don’t need guns that are called cop killers or machine guns that can kill many people. This has to be restricted to the military and the police .

Need an answer?
Get insightful answers from community-recommended
in Geography on Knoji.
Would you recommend this author as an expert in Geography?
You have 0 recommendations remaining to grant today.
Comments (3)

I'll state upfront that I am a NRA member and have been ever since I turned sixteen and received my first big game hunting license. I received my first real gun, a lever action .22 rifle when I was fourteen and have been an avid gun collector ever since. No one will take away mu guns or my right to bear arms except over my dead body. On the other hand, I respect everyone's right to freely voice their opinion. That too is guaranteed by the constitution. With that said, I'm ready to comment on your article. I think that every one is missing the point here. Guns don't kill people. People kill people. Take away all the guns and those set on doing someone grave bodily harm will find another instrument to do it with. Besides that, criminals don't care if an automatic weapon i.e. machine gun, is illegal or not, if they want one they will get one. "Cop Killers", I love that one. Any gun loaded with a teflon or armor piercing round can be called a cop killer. Has anyone really stopped to think that maybe, just maybe the reason that death by firearms is so high in this country is because criminals have guns but the law abiding citizens can't get them because of the laws controling them? Criminals will always have guns and all the gun laws are doing is making the honest citizen a sitting duck for the criminal to prey on.

I respect your opinion,Jerry. You made some good points on the other side. Sure Guns don’t kill people. People kill people. I agree 100%. But on the other hand, Would you like children walking down the street with a machine gun like what they teach in african nations. Good movie to watch on this is, Blood Diamond with Leonardio Caprino. But you have a great point with Criminals having more guns on street than citizens. Hard situation to deal with. On a the economy: Bail out Banks, No, Bail out People, Yes. Why don't they give people the money instead of the banks. Why because stockbrokers and big business is running the show, the reason: Money! If you want to create your own membership website, I am giving away Free Membership Software. Let me know, Take care, slimshady22248202

Good article. Please check out this article and tell me what you think. Thanks.